One of the interesting aspects of being an external supplier is
watching how companies approach marketing activity. Like many chaotic systems,
it sometimes seems there is no pattern at all. But step back to see the full
spectrum of personalities, inter-departmental empires and embedded supply
chains and some of those weird decisions start to make sense.
For all the planning, meetings, research, discussions,
presentations, submissions and tenders, where do your final decisions come
from? The most obvious feature of "human adjusted" decision making,
is the gulf between strategy and action. Here are some of the beliefs we come
across that seem to stand in the way of fully achieving marketing objectives.
"Internal
resources are free!" This concept has stood the test of time. There
are two main reasons why a business continues to work on a project long after
it should have been delegated to an expert supplier. The first is that it is
fun or interesting. Photo shoots and logo designs tend to have senior
management being very hands-on. The alternative is the junior employee who can
"handle that." These tasks, such as print production, go fine until
there is a problem.
It is important to
fully judge the true cost of internal resources, not only in terms of time,
salary and lost production, but also new equipment, training, stress and
re-dos. A good supplier brings ideas and experience to your brief and takes
ownership of the outcome.
"Everyone
shares my interests!" We have seen huge sponsorships put into horse
racing and motor sport that would have very limited cut-through for grocery
shopping customers. Marketing budgets seem ripe to become a slush fund for
personal hobbies.
When considering
projects, a good guide is to refer back to your customers' decision making
process. By analysing customer behaviour, you can better judge the potential
successful of an activity.
"I would
never wear that colour!" Another obstacle
is confusing the values of staff with the values of the brand. Some managers
live their products but many don't, yet still create ads to appeal to them, not
their customers.
A strong, well
defined brand will make decision making easier and less subjective. It
will move discussions away from personal
opinions, towards ideas that best represent the interests of customers.
"That worked
well, now what's our next idea?" So often marketing
ideas are run for a while before being dropped or replaced unnecessarily. Many
in-store campaigns are only run once until the allotted time or budget expires.
Then there is an assumption a whole new activity is required for the next
campaign.
Staff work with a
campaign day-in, day-out, but for customers your marketing is probably a small
part of their life. Applying a continuous improvement philosophy to marketing
will slowly improve outcomes and give you the greatest return on good marketing
ideas.
"Everyone is
doing it!" This can also be called, "I've just seen a
great idea!" Following the herd is tempting, they must know what they're
doing, right. Groupthink applies not only to branding and ideas, but also to
media. A lot of activity seems to be produced by people looking over their
shoulder and not focussing on their own goals. This is a shame, as new media
has incredible potential to deliver customised and powerful solutions.
Get some space
from your competitors by having a clear understanding of where your business
sits in your territory. Carefully identify which aspects should be unique and
push them hard, both in terms of creative and media. This will ensure you are
not following others for security, but offering your customers real reasons to
consider your offer.
So, as you develop marketing plans, consider these issues and make
sure you are not selectively interpreting data, or being swayed by your
competitors. The less chaotic your decision making, the easier it is to see how
your project went and plan for improvement.
No comments:
Post a Comment